Sponsored

Dark Horse at Dealership

Lorne34

Project Hidalgo
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Threads
61
Messages
3,188
Reaction score
3,087
Location
Wisconsin
First Name
Lorne
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT350
Vehicle Showcase
1
I was at my Ford dealership getting the Shelby GT350 serviced and spotted a Dark Horse in the show room. There were some things I really liked about it, others not so much. The front end should have been used during the 2018 s550 refresh. It is the best feature of the new body design. From the back I get the narrow tail lights being a nod to the old school fast backs, but I don't think it works on the modern design.
The interior feels more upscale, but the lack of tactile knobs, buttons, and switches for often used controls really bothered me. Everything is stuck in those ipad screen displays.
The seats were pretty comfortable.
Not sure if I like the dark horse logo/badging.. just kind of meh.. maybe it's the size and placement.
Overall for the price I would not desire to own one of these. For 15k less I'll keep my Shelby.
.

20240521_153256183_iOS.jpg


20240521_153306348_iOS.jpg


20240521_153316639_iOS.jpg


20240521_153324946_iOS.jpg


20240521_153340926_iOS.jpg
Sponsored

 

GregO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Threads
41
Messages
2,646
Reaction score
1,818
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
S550 GTPP
I get the narrow tail lights being a nod to the old school fast backs, but I don't think it works on the modern design.
The design team really blew it on those wacky taillights. There’s a DH parked daily at one of the places I do contract work and it’s been three months of seeing the taillights and I can’t get past that design. Everything else on the exterior of the S650 works well.
 
Last edited:

Mike Pfeifer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
1,214
Reaction score
1,431
Location
Wesley Chapel, FL
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2019 Ruby Red Mustang GT A10
The design team really blew it on those whacky taillights. There’s a DH parked daily at one of the places I do contract work and it’s been three months of seeing the taillights and I can’t get past that design. Everything else on the exterior of the S650 works well.
The tail lights are weird to me too, looking forward to a mid cycle refresh to see what ford does with them. The rest of the car I’m ok with, including the “iPad on the dash” so many complain about. As a BMW tech, I see that all day every day and it’s fine.
 

ChitownStang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Threads
75
Messages
2,958
Reaction score
3,624
Location
Chicago, North Shore
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mach 1
Vehicle Showcase
1
To me the Front end is the worst part of the new design. Also the rear diffuser looks cheap.
Interior is not sports car.
$70k for the same thing I paid $56k for in my 21. Mach 1 premium... what you smoking Ford?!
$14k for 200 more pounds?? LOL
 

Hack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Threads
84
Messages
12,413
Reaction score
7,638
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Mustang, Camaro
I was at my Ford dealership getting the Shelby GT350 serviced and spotted a Dark Horse in the show room. There were some things I really liked about it, others not so much. The front end should have been used during the 2018 s550 refresh. It is the best feature of the new body design. From the back I get the narrow tail lights being a nod to the old school fast backs, but I don't think it works on the modern design.
The interior feels more upscale, but the lack of tactile knobs, buttons, and switches for often used controls really bothered me. Everything is stuck in those ipad screen displays.
The seats were pretty comfortable.
Not sure if I like the dark horse logo/badging.. just kind of meh.. maybe it's the size and placement.
Overall for the price I would not desire to own one of these. For 15k less I'll keep my Shelby.
.

20240521_153256183_iOS.jpg


20240521_153306348_iOS.jpg
I don't mind the horse on the side instead of the 5.0 logo. To me the 5.0 is played out. But Ford should have taken advantage and put a 6 liter engine or larger in the Dark Horse.

I agree deleting interior physical controls is probably the biggest miss on that car. That - and the price - are my biggest objections to the car.

I like the styling. I'm glad Ford made a significant change as the S550 styling has been around way too long. It was past due to change the tail lights especially. Yes they are great looking, but the last refresh really didn't change the look from the rear of the car.
 

Sponsored

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
108
Messages
11,182
Reaction score
9,460
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
Everytime I think maybe it's growing on me, I go look at one in person. Hard pass.
 
OP
OP
Lorne34

Lorne34

Project Hidalgo
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Threads
61
Messages
3,188
Reaction score
3,087
Location
Wisconsin
First Name
Lorne
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT350
Vehicle Showcase
1
I really don't mind the "ipads" they look better in person, but please please leave the manual control options for heating cooling, stereo, etc..
It definitely looks more refined and not raw muscle or sports car as well.
Here is a picture that I think represents what Ford was getting at with the rear taillights. Still don't like it on the newer style..
.
60 mustang by hotel2.jpg
 

Hack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Threads
84
Messages
12,413
Reaction score
7,638
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Mustang, Camaro
Isn't the 15k price increase inflation ? Everything has gone up.
I think Ford decided to raise prices as much as the market will bear. I don't think they looked at costs/profit margin to make that decision.

For the most part I like it ok and I think it's a well tarted-up Mustang GT. I would consider one for around $40K, but $70K? I would feel like an idiot for spending that much.
 

Sponsored

ChitownStang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Threads
75
Messages
2,958
Reaction score
3,624
Location
Chicago, North Shore
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mach 1
Vehicle Showcase
1
I think Ford decided to raise prices as much as the market will bear. I don't think they looked at costs/profit margin to make that decision.

For the most part I like it ok and I think it's a well tarted-up Mustang GT. I would consider one for around $40K, but $70K? I would feel like an idiot for spending that much.
Plenty of idiots in this country! Look who’s president… lol
 

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
91
Messages
15,246
Reaction score
12,802
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
Here is a picture that I think represents what Ford was getting at with the rear tailligh
right and on THAT car they look CORRECT. The dimensions on the S650 are all kinds of WRONG.

A 1st year design student would have been slaped across the face and made to sit in the corner with the dunce cap on, had they turned in a paper depicting the S650 rear end. I bet if they showed it to the School for the Blind down the street from HQ they too would heap redicule on it.
 

DarthMalice

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Threads
26
Messages
591
Reaction score
680
Location
Huntsville, AL
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1 M0960; AT; Fighter Jet Gray
I am so polar opposite of the design/marketing team of S650-i am more of the Porsche school of thought...if it is working, don't change it. You know what S650 would have been if I were king for a day:
little to no exterior changes - certainly no truck front end with Honda/Camaro headlights nor those awful rear lights and Camaro bumper
-Interior - certainly no glued on iPads: I would have removed the cd player and physical sound/radio controls to enable a larger center screen...keep buttons for radio/volume on steering wheel; no change to digital dash from S550 - that was perfection
retain A/C physical controls
-retained the toggles but make them bi-directional and subdued coloring like Shelbys
no Bronco steering wheel center-too bulky and looks like it belongs in a SUV/truck; retained round but kept the flat bottom larger diameter wheel
Minor interior material updates are fine...I don't see what the big deal is because they are minor anyways -if I needed to save costs...this would be first part of refresh to go
Retained dual brow, analog gauges, and circular vents (I don't know what the complaint ever was on those...allows for maximum adjustment)
Big adds for interior tech: PDR, optional heads up

Majority of refresh money to:
dual intake coyote - again, didn't really improve performance much but it is cool looking and a "talking point" upgrade - no ECU lock...probably the single dumbest thing they did
Handling - chassis work/stiffer bushings and magneride and much improved steering - whatever they did didn't really work...just sped it up but it got worse from a feeling perspective. Hell, Ford "stopping the hop" from the factory probably would have led to more sales than anything else alone.

The irony is that S550 Mustang was selling (10 years in a row best selling sports car)...this honestly would have addressed all of the concerns of the demographic that actually bought the car. Now we have a divisive car that really hasn't been selling well as most mustang fans are just keeping the S550.
 
Last edited:

gone_n_60

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Threads
58
Messages
1,061
Reaction score
1,370
Location
Indianapolis
First Name
Whit
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang GT PP Convertible
While attending a wedding near Phoenix a really, really nice Budget Fastbreak guy did me a solid when I asked if he had my Mustang (had my Mustang hat on) and set me up with a 2024 Red 4 cycl for less than $100 more that what I was getting. Nice to drive even the 4 cycl, but I was trying to adjust the fan without driving into the oncoming lane 3 times. Had my wife finally deal with it. Tried to change the temp, again over the double yellow because you HAVE to look at the gd screen so close to get the control working.

Okay If you grew up texting during your driving test maybe this works but ffs why make controls you HAVE to look at, taking your eyes off driving to just get cool air??! I'll keep my 2020 manual controls though S650 drove nicely.

fwiw note: if you want to make cracks about older dudes can't coordinate, I play drums pretty well, both feet and hands doing different strokes, upbeat, downbeat. So not a slacker there.
 

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
91
Messages
15,246
Reaction score
12,802
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
but ffs why make controls you HAVE to look at, taking your eyes off driving to just get cool air?
because it was designed by a cubicle gnome who never took human factors and in true "computer weenie" fashion thinks that OF COURSE you have to hit the graphically depicted touch point and not even 10 pixels off.

This is what happens when you let "computer guys" design interfaces and interaction. They are bloody horrendous at it.

At least VW had the "good sense" (back in 2020?) to actively disable the whole damn screen when the vehicle was in motion. So you couldn't even TRY to change stuff.

And whatever blithering idiot designed Ford's cruise control button MESS on the steering wheel deserves a week in the hot box as well. My Audi uses a stalk. Couldn't be easier and can be done via casual feel. Even if you just HAVE TO do the controls using a button pad, you can do it in 4 buttons, not 6 and frankly you can do it with just 2. Again WITHOUT looking at it.
Sponsored

 
 




Top