Told you so? ;)No, what they said is that it will beat a BOSS around the track, but hp-wise it will slot between the current GT and the BOSS, so ~430 would be realistic.
12-16-2013, 08:42 PM
Sponsored
Told you so? ;)No, what they said is that it will beat a BOSS around the track, but hp-wise it will slot between the current GT and the BOSS, so ~430 would be realistic.
12-16-2013, 08:42 PM
You're welcome. If I've missed any that were within 5 HP or less I apologize. I truly wanted to be wrong on my guess, and I was I just hope those that greatly overestimated don't give this new Mustang a chance. I think it is going to be the best performing one yet.Thanks for re-posting some of the guesses and saving us time from going back to look
Missed yours, sorry.Originally Posted by GTTK View Post
No, what they said is that it will beat a BOSS around the track, but hp-wise it will slot between the current GT and the BOSS, so ~430 would be realistic.
12-16-2013, 08:42 PM
Keep an Eye out for a new Track Key from Ford....that's what I want.Ohhhh..., at 435HP I'm hoping I can buy a programmer (http://diablosport.shptron.com/p/i-1000-intune-color-touch-screen-flash-programmer?pp=8&pp=8) to get it to at least 450HP if you use 93 octane. Has anybody had any luck independently verifying you get 15 extra HP from stock numbers with the 93 octane tune? I would go down the road of buying some cheap upgrades that don't void your warranty to get at least 460HP. Does anybody have a good list? Does the K&N filter still make an improvement? Did Ford de-tune the engine so they can re-tune it in 2016? If it is just a SW tune, can we just download the 2016 firmware into the 2015 when released?
With the 2015 model having both 2.46% higher weight and only 3.57% higher HP than the old body style 2014 model, the two figures kind of cancel each other in my opinion. I guess Ford figured they would sell most cars based on the new body style the first year, then later add HP as needed to keep the interest in future models higher. I wanted the new Mustang to have a much better acceleration than the old one but fear that was a pipe-dream for the 2015 model.
You know that would be pretty cool if Ford would hide a "performance algorithm" or tune in the stock programming that you could buy a "track key" to unlock say another 20/25 HP and 10 TQ and they sold it through Ford Performance. Still within engine parameters and still with full warranty.Keep an Eye out for a new Track Key from Ford....that's what I want.
Your WelcomeYou know that would be pretty cool if Ford would hide a "performance algorithm" or tune in the stock programming that you could buy a "track key" to unlock say another 20/25 HP and 10 TQ and they sold it through Ford Performance. Still within engine parameters and still with full warranty.
Glad I was wrong about this!I also don't think we will see anything until August. The Mustang Alley event occurs on Saturday, August 16, which happens to be the same week as the first week of Job 1 production, so perhaps that timing would be possible. However, I guess it depends if the numbers come straight from Ford first, then followed by numbers in what the press might receive.
If we look at somewhat recent chassis debuts, the 2005 Mustang GT was introduced with 300 hp, 5 less than the outgoing MACH I which was rated at 305 hp.
While all the upgrades to the Coyote are significant, IMO Ford will go easy on the Boss owners and stay just shy of the 444 hp rating, especially considering the Coyote v2 has a similar intake manifold to v1, not the Boss or CJ that many anticipated.
I also agree that these upgrades are to improve power under the curve, as well as lower emissions and fuel consumption, but also to pave the way for even more power if and when DI finds its way into the mix.
440/410
Thanks for the link. This is very close to what I'm describing. I'd actually like the calibrations/tune to actually be in the computer stock when you buy it. Sort of pre-tuned, then you buy the key and it activates the tune already installed in your pcm. This is basically Ford flashing a tune into your car. Cool but I'd rather just buy my own handheld. But…. if I could keep the warranty intact this could be very appealing. Thanks for the link, I did not know Ford was doing this I just assumed they were still doing the ProCal tuning option.Your Welcome
Improved engine performance- Up to 60lb-ft at 1500rpm & peak increases of 16 hp and 7 lb-ft on 93 octane fuel
http://www.fordracingpartsdirect.com/2014_MUSTANG_GT_TRACK_KEY_p/m-14204-mgttka.htm
Those gains on the new engine
451HP/407TQ no more needed.
I took a guesses using PTW ratio. My 1st guess was equaling the GT, I did manage to guess it will be out this week.WOT said:Purely guessing the numbers and guessing we should know the numbers on Monday or this week.
1. 435hp
2. 457hp
I think this one is a range. But I will put it up.
Depends of what you're looking for, Flywheel HP or RWHP? A tune only should get you to 450 at the fly with better throttle response easily. Not sure what MM that the 15 uses for an intake but whatever it is I'm sure it's capable or handling a few bolt ons. IMO I think this car will take to bolt ons better than the last.Ohhhh..., at 435HP I'm hoping I can buy a programmer (http://diablosport.shptron.com/p/i-1000-intune-color-touch-screen-flash-programmer?pp=8&pp=8) to get it to at least 450HP if you use 93 octane. Has anybody had any luck independently verifying you get 15 extra HP from stock numbers with the 93 octane tune? I would go down the road of buying some cheap upgrades that don't void your warranty to get at least 460HP. Does anybody have a good list? Does the K&N filter still make an improvement? Did Ford de-tune the engine so they can re-tune it in 2016? If it is just a SW tune, can we just download the 2016 firmware into the 2015 when released?
Yes, they do cancel them selves out in peak numbers but under the curve is still uncertain. Not just improved styling but also improved handling. When adding HP and weight your MPG usually suffers and maintaining that MPG or adding becomes a challenge. You wont see an increase in power unless they add some sort of cylinder deactivation coupled with the use of DI. Without seeing the power curve I'm not sure how much better it is stock for stock, modded I can easily see it beating the current 5.0 in power out put.With the 2015 model having both 2.46% higher weight and only 3.57% higher HP than the old body style 2014 model, the two figures kind of cancel each other in my opinion. I guess Ford figured they would sell most cars based on the new body style the first year, then later add HP as needed to keep the interest in future models higher. I wanted the new Mustang to have a much better acceleration than the old one but fear that was a pipe-dream for the 2015 model.
I guess I was pretty damn close.I will say 435/395.
None takenIt lets some of us weed out those with a brain and the dumbasses. No disrespect. ;)
So does this mean we're unlikely to see decent power gains from a headers, catback exhaust, cold air intake, etc?To everybody who was, um, excessively optimistic about the 2015 numbers: you should've read this very detailed article about the BOSS engine
http://www.mustangandfords.com/car-reviews/m5lp-1108-2011-ford-mustang-302/
It shows just how much work it took for the relatively modest bump from 408 to 444 hp (yes I know it's overall behavior is different). I was left with the impression that the coyote was already pretty much maxed out as design. That's why I didn't have very high expectations for the 2015 model.