Sponsored

Steeda Ultra Lite Linear Stance

kroy11

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
233
Reaction score
69
Location
Kentucky
First Name
Kelby
Vehicle(s)
2015 Race Red Manual GT
Nope the rear drop is too much, hence why I used spring spacers.

In an ideal world the front would be an additional 5mm lower and rear 10mm higher in a perfect world.

But I love the stance on my car now with spring spacer.
Wouldn't this kind of be equivalent to the bmr handling springs? 1.2" drop in front and .5" drop in rear?
Sponsored

 

Gibbo205

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2015
Threads
156
Messages
6,673
Reaction score
2,208
Location
UK
Vehicle(s)
UK 2015 Mustang & BMW E46 M3
Wouldn't this kind of be equivalent to the bmr handling springs? 1.2" drop in front and .5" drop in rear?
Yes just a tad lower. But I the BMR would be too firm for me, I like the Steeda rates and it is far easier to just add spring pads and cheaper than changing the springs again.
 

kroy11

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
233
Reaction score
69
Location
Kentucky
First Name
Kelby
Vehicle(s)
2015 Race Red Manual GT
Yes just a tad lower. But I the BMR would be too firm for me, I like the Steeda rates and it is far easier to just add spring pads and cheaper than changing the springs again.
How do the rates effect drivability? The higher the rate the rougher the ride or is it the exact opposite? I'm not sure how it works sorry.
 

Highvoltage16

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
81
Reaction score
49
Location
Hammond, La
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT PP Ingot silver
I like the drop. The ultralites with FRPP shocks and struts ride far better imo than the stock PP setup.
image.jpg
 

Sponsored

teej281

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Threads
1
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Location
Central PA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang Ecoboost Premium PP Auto
Can I be honest, I feel like the Steeda Ultralites (at least in the photos I've seen on this forum) lower the rear too much OR don't lower the front enough. I understand actual height is different between F and R fender, but I want the wheel gap to be much closer (to the same) front and rear. With these, I am seeing more gap up front than the rear. Can this just be the tire selection of folks? I'd be doing 275-35 and 305-35 tires.
Going with those two tire sizes seems like an odd choice in my book. If you research the tire diameter difference between the two, it's almost an inch. So if you would do that you'd have an extra half inch of tire filling up the rear wheel well over the fronts so you're going to have the problem of unequal wheel gap no matter what springs you use. However, that tire size combo will give you a more raked stance because of the extra tire height in the rear over the front.

For an equal tire height staggered combo, I'd look into a 275/40-315/35 combo or 275/35-315/30 combo. Or 265/40-305/35 or 265/35-305/30. I'm not quite familiar with the tire sizing combos just yet for these chassis cars, but I do know tire sizing and these numbers work out with my calculator as almost exact height sizing so you don't have to worry about abs system going nuts and you don't have off looking sizing front to rear.
 

David@Steeda

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Threads
78
Messages
3,433
Reaction score
1,910
Location
United States
Website
www.steeda.com
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
Bolt-on, slammed S197

thatmustang609

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 24, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
70
Reaction score
21
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
15 PP Mustang GT - Kenne Bell 3.2LC
Negative camber on the rear are killing my tires. Still waiting for steeda adjustable camber arms.

 
Last edited:

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,527
Reaction score
3,875
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
Negative camber on the rear are killing my tires. Still waiting for steeda adjustable camber arms.
Sounds like your toe is off. I am at -2.1 and have no wear problems at all.
 

Sponsored

thatmustang609

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 24, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
70
Reaction score
21
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
15 PP Mustang GT - Kenne Bell 3.2LC
Ill have to find the print out and check. If I recall correctly, the toe was on point.
 

Gibbo205

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2015
Threads
156
Messages
6,673
Reaction score
2,208
Location
UK
Vehicle(s)
UK 2015 Mustang & BMW E46 M3
Negative camber on the rear are killing my tires. Still waiting for steeda adjustable camber arms.


Why wait, stock car has full adjustable rear camber, I am on Steeda ultralites and I could dial in as little at -1 rear negative or as much as -3 negative. No need for rear camber arms. :)
 

David@Steeda

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Threads
78
Messages
3,433
Reaction score
1,910
Location
United States
Website
www.steeda.com
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
Bolt-on, slammed S197

thatmustang609

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 24, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
70
Reaction score
21
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
15 PP Mustang GT - Kenne Bell 3.2LC
I took it to ford and they said they adjusted the rear and its still around -2.6 camber or something like that. When I get home I will check.
 

David@Steeda

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Threads
78
Messages
3,433
Reaction score
1,910
Location
United States
Website
www.steeda.com
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
Bolt-on, slammed S197
In case you guys missed it, preview of our new Extreme Ultralite Lowering Springs :)
IMG_4151.jpg
Sponsored

 
 




Top