Jumped Ship!

[foghat]

According to whom?

http://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ng-performance-data-and-complete-specs-page-5

Clearly the scat pack loses to mustang gt in all those categories. GT handled better, stopped faster, and got to 150mph 2 seconds quicker than a scat pack.

Well, he did say base GT and the GT is PP in that link. So the handling and numbers probably become a fair bit closer and with only a 2 foot difference against PP, edge probably goes to scat pack with base gt brakes.

Sponsored

 

[1320']

According to whom?

http://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ng-performance-data-and-complete-specs-page-5

Clearly the scat pack loses to mustang gt in all those categories. GT handled better, stopped faster, and got to 150mph 2 seconds quicker than a scat pack.

You do know a GTPP isn't a base GT right?

 

[99gtp]

You do know a GTPP isn't a base GT right?

Sure it is everywhere in the world except for America.;)

 

[ATLalien]

According to whom?

http://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ng-performance-data-and-complete-specs-page-5

Clearly the scat pack loses to mustang gt in all those categories. GT handled better, stopped faster, and got to 150mph 2 seconds quicker than a scat pack.

Check these numbers on the Charger Scat Pack:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-dodge-charger-r-t-scat-pack-test-review

At 4.1 to 60 and 12.4 in the quarter bone stock, a stock Mustang isn't going to match that auto or manual. Course the Mustang would still destroy the heavier car on a road course, but the Charger owns the straight line.

Sponsored