BmacIL
Enginerd
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
- Threads
- 69
- Messages
- 15,010
- Reaction score
- 8,922
- Location
- Naperville, IL
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
- Vehicle Showcase
- 1
- Thread starter
- #1
I've been doing some digging and came across something interesting. The GT350 front lower control arms appeared to have a longer ball joint stud compared with the GT PP arms. Both of these have the bearings at the inner points compared with non-PP lower arms. I decided to order a couple and see for myself.
The results: yes indeed, the GT350 stud is 0.5" longer and puts the pivot point 0.5" lower than the GT PP arm. Pictures below (GT350 top, GT PP bottom, thanks [MENTION=9985]BMR Tech[/MENTION] for a better pic of the PP one). It's very interesting to find that Ford chose to raise the roll center (and add anti-dive) on both the GT350 and GT350R for the minimal lowering compared to the GT (0.3" and 0.7" respectively). This is obviously part of the formula that makes these cars work so well.
Results to follow later for how much that 0.5" lower ball changes the roll center, but I can tell you that it results in a fairly significant angle change, given the length of the arm (pretty short).
The results: yes indeed, the GT350 stud is 0.5" longer and puts the pivot point 0.5" lower than the GT PP arm. Pictures below (GT350 top, GT PP bottom, thanks [MENTION=9985]BMR Tech[/MENTION] for a better pic of the PP one). It's very interesting to find that Ford chose to raise the roll center (and add anti-dive) on both the GT350 and GT350R for the minimal lowering compared to the GT (0.3" and 0.7" respectively). This is obviously part of the formula that makes these cars work so well.
Results to follow later for how much that 0.5" lower ball changes the roll center, but I can tell you that it results in a fairly significant angle change, given the length of the arm (pretty short).
Sponsored
Last edited: