E85 on a boosted fa20 made a much bigger difference. Allowed the boost to be turned up higher without sacrificing safety.E85 tunes for BRZ are impressive, +35whp & +30wtq. But, some 2.3EB tuners are doing +60whp & +100wtq without switching to E85. So initially seems like 2.3EBs are less challenging, in my opinion. But big hp, like 600hp might take a year or 2 for aftermarket to develop parts. Tomei used old school hybrid EJ25/20 in all their early BRZ race/drift cars, so proven WRX & STi engine parts helped the BRZ gain fame. Gave the aftermarket time to develop parts for FA20. 2.3EB will just take a little time too,... I think.
That's going to be expensive for what it produces. Have to wait for other cheaper kits. Jdl might use my car to make hot parts and a cai.ok
Full-Race has a EFR7163 twinscroll turbo kit coming soon. :clap2:
www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php/full-racei-5886.html
Interesting read! Thanks!OK, I'm guessing nobody knows for sure - let me share what I know.
2005 Ford Focus Duratec - I re-wrote the tune for E85 by changing the Stoich and fuel tables and simply added E85 to the tank. Worked like a champ and was good for 14HP over an 87 Octane tune - no other mods.
The O-rings are Viton (E85 proof) and the rest of the system was rated for E20 (as per Ford). This leaves me to believe that the VAST majority of Fords since then are Alcohol safe just based on the current E0-E20 fuel mandates nationally.
I have THOUSANDS of miles on E85 (and various mixes), and 215,000 on the clock.
Injectors were pulled and tested about 35K ago with ZERO issues and they were near SPOTLESS (Flow tested to within 1% of baseline from years ago).
The issue we are going to face is what are the fuel injectors rated at? These are MOTORCRAFT Part #CM5232 (According to RockAuto.com) and are NOT showing up on any cross reference or databases yet.
However, all these companies that keep pimping their tunes could tell us what Ford is using for injector size in the fuel tables...
That will be our biggest hang up.
They have a wideband, so I assume this really helps control AFRNot sure, but I wouldn't doubt it for a second.
Direct injection is FAR better at managing AFRs too, less fuel is wasted from standoff, etc. So that buys us some "headroom" if Ford calculated the Injector size based on the Duratec (24lbs).
Also, it would be nice to know what these naysayers are using for a "safe" injector Duty Cycle and what BSFC they are using in their calculations...